Lars WILMES




Post Doc

Phone :
Send an email








7 publication(s) since Décembre 2020:


Sort by

07/2025 | Mol Psychiatry
Nutritional interventions to counteract the detrimental consequences of early-life stress.
Geertsema J, Juncker HG, Wilmes L, Burchell GL, de Rooij SR, van Goudoever JB, O'Riordan KJ, Clarke G, Cryan JF, Korosi A
doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03020-1

Abstract:
Exposure to stress during sensitive developmental periods comes with long term consequences for neurobehavioral outcomes and increases vulnerability to psychopathology later in life. While we have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the programming effects of early-life stress (ES), these are not yet fully understood and often hard to target, making the development of effective interventions challenging. In recent years, we and others have suggested that nutrition might be instrumental in modulating and possibly combatting the ES-induced increased risk to psychopathologies and neurobehavioral impairments. Nutritional strategies are very promising as they might be relatively safe, cheap and easy to implement. Here, we set out to comprehensively review the existing literature on nutritional interventions aimed at counteracting the effects of ES on neurobehavioral outcomes in preclinical and clinical settings. We identified eighty six rodent and ten human studies investigating a nutritional intervention to ameliorate ES-induced impairments. The human evidence to date, is too few and heterogeneous in terms of interventions, thus not allowing hard conclusions, however the preclinical studies, despite their heterogeneity in terms of designs, interventions used, and outcomes measured, showed nutritional interventions to be promising in combatting ES-induced impairments. Furthermore, we discuss the possible mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of nutrition on the brain after ES, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation and the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Lastly, we highlight the critical gaps in our current knowledge and make recommendations for future research to move the field forward.




02/11/2024 | Cell Metab
Gut microbiota regulates stress responsivity via the circadian system.
Tofani GSS, Leigh SJ, Gheorghe CE, Bastiaanssen TFS, Wilmes L, Sen P, Clarke G, Cryan JF

Abstract:
Stress and circadian systems are interconnected through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to maintain responses to external stimuli. Yet, the mechanisms of how such signals are orchestrated remain unknown. Here, we uncover the gut microbiota as a regulator of HPA-axis rhythmicity. Microbial depletion disturbs the brain transcriptome and metabolome in stress-responding pathways in the hippocampus and amygdala across the day. This is coupled with a dysregulation of the circadian pacemaker in the brain that results in perturbed glucocorticoid rhythmicity. The resulting hyper-activation of the HPA axis at the sleep/wake transition drives time-of-day-specific impairments of the stress response and stress-sensitive behaviors. Finally, microbiota transplantation confirmed that diurnal oscillations of gut microbes underlie altered glucocorticoid secretion and that L. reuteri is a candidate strain for such effects. Our data offer compelling evidence that the microbiota regulates stress responsiveness in a circadian manner and is necessary to respond adaptively to stressors throughout the day.




11/2024 | neurobiol stress
Sex specific gut-microbiota signatures of resilient and comorbid gut-brain phenotypes induced by early life stress.
Wilmes L, Caputi V, Bastiaanssen TFS, Collins JM, Crispie F, Cotter PD, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Clarke G, O'Mahony SM

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Alterations in gut-brain axis communication pathways and the gut microbiota ecosystem caused by early life stress have been extensively described as critical players in the pathophysiology of stress-induced disorders. However, the extent to which stress-induced gut microbiota alterations manifest in early life and contribute to the sex-specific susceptibility to distinct gut-brain phenotypes in adulthood has yet to be defined. METHODS: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rat offspring underwent maternal separation (3h/day from postnatal day 2-12). Faecal samples were collected before weaning for gut microbiota 16S rRNA sequencing and metabolomic analysis. Visceral pain sensitivity and negative valence behaviours were assessed in adulthood using colorectal distension and the forced swim test respectively. Behavioural data were processed in a two-step cluster analysis to identify groupings within the dataset. Multi-omics analysis was carried out to investigate if the microbial signatures following early life stress were already defined according to the membership of the adult behavioural phenotypes. RESULTS: Maternal separation resulted in increased visceral hypersensitivity while showing a trend for a sex-dependent increase in negative valence behaviour in adulthood. The cluster analysis revealed four clusters within the dataset representing distinct pathophysiological domains reminiscent of the behavioural consequences of early-life stress: 1. resilient, 2. pain, 3. immobile and 4. comorbid. The early life gut microbiota of each of these clusters show distinct alterations in terms of diversity, genus level differential abundance, and functional modules. Multi-omic integrations points towards a role for different metabolic pathways underlying each cluster-specific phenotype. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to identify distinct phenotypes defined by susceptibility or resilience to gut-brain dysfunction induced by early life stress. The gut microbiota in early life shows sex-dependent alterations in each cluster that precede specific behavioural phenotypes in adulthood. Future research is warranted to determine the causal relationship between early-life stress-induced changes in the gut microbiota and to understand the trajectory leading to the manifestation of different behavioural phenotypes in adulthood.




10/2023 | J Physiol
The impact of acute and chronic stress on gastrointestinal physiology and function: a microbiota-gut-brain axis perspective.
Leigh SJ, Uhlig F, Wilmes L, Sanchez-Diaz P, Gheorghe CE, Goodson MS, Kelley-Loughnane N, Hyland NP, Cryan JF, Clarke G
doi: 10.1113/JP281951

Abstract:
The physiological consequences of stress often manifest in the gastrointestinal tract. Traumatic or chronic stress is associated with widespread maladaptive changes throughout the gut, although comparatively little is known about the effects of acute stress. Furthermore, these stress-induced changes in the gut may increase susceptibility to gastrointestinal disorders and infection, and impact critical features of the neural and behavioural consequences of the stress response by impairing gut-brain axis communication. Understanding the mechanisms behind changes in enteric nervous system circuitry, visceral sensitivity, gut barrier function, permeability, and the gut microbiota following stress is an important research objective with pathophysiological implications in both neurogastroenterology and psychiatry. Moreover, the gut microbiota has emerged as a key aspect of physiology sensitive to the effects of stress. In this review, we focus on different aspects of the gastrointestinal tract including gut barrier function as well as the immune, humoral and neuronal elements involved in gut-brain communication. Furthermore, we discuss the evidence for a role of stress in gastrointestinal disorders. Existing gaps in the current literature are highlighted, and possible avenues for future research with an integrated physiological perspective have been suggested. A more complete understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of the integrated host and microbial response to different kinds of stressors in the gastrointestinal tract will enable full exploitation of the diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the fast-evolving field of host-microbiome interactions.




Abstract:
Affective disorders, such as major depression, are frequently associated with metabolic disturbances involving mitochondria. Although dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is known to alter energy metabolism, the precise mechanisms linking stress and metabolic disturbances are not sufficiently understood. We used a mouse model of affective disorders to investigate the impact of a genetic predisposition for extremes in stress reactivity on behavioural and metabolic phenotypes as well as energy metabolism. Adult males of three independent mouse lines selectively bred for high, intermediate or low HPA axis reactivity were tested for exploratory and locomotor activity as well as stress-coping behaviour. Additionally, basal and stress-induced plasma corticosterone levels, body weight, food intake and body composition were measured. At the molecular level, the hippocampal transcriptome was analysed using microarray, serial analysis of gene expression and qRT-PCR. Finally, mitochondrial DNA copy number, damages and mitochondrial respiration were assessed. We found clear effects of the differential stress reactivity on the behavioural, morphometric and metabolic measures. Remarkably, the hyperactive behavioural and neuroendocrine stress-coping style of high-reactivity mice was associated with significant changes in the expression of an extended list of genes involved in energy metabolism and several mitochondrial functions. Yet, only minor changes were found in mitochondrial DNA copy number, damages and respiration. Thus, our findings support a prominent role of glucocorticoids in shaping the major endophenotypes of the stress reactivity mouse model and contribute towards understanding the important role of HPA axis dysregulation and changes in energy metabolism in the pathophysiology of affective disorders.




03/2021 | Neurogastroenterol Motil
Of bowels, brain and behavior: A role for the gut microbiota in psychiatric comorbidities in irritable bowel syndrome.
Wilmes L, Collins JM, O'Riordan KJ, O'Mahony SM, Cryan JF, Clarke G
doi: 10.1111/nmo.14095

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The gastrointestinal microbiota has emerged as a key regulator of gut-brain axis signalling with important implications for neurogastroenterology. There is continuous bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain facilitated by neuronal, endocrine, metabolic, and immune pathways. The microbiota influences these signalling pathways via several mechanisms. Studies have shown compositional and functional alterations in the gut microbiota in stress-related psychiatric disorders. Gut microbiota reconfigurations are also a feature of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a gut-brain axis disorder sharing high levels of psychiatric comorbidity including both anxiety and depression. It remains unclear how the gut microbiota alterations in IBS align with both core symptoms and these psychiatric comorbidities. METHODS: In this review, we highlight common and disparate features of these microbial signatures as well as the associated gut-brain axis signalling pathways. Studies suggest that patients with either IBS, depression or anxiety, alone or comorbid, present with alterations in gut microbiota composition and harbor immune, endocrine, and serotonergic system alterations relevant to the common pathophysiology of these comorbid conditions. KEY RESULTS: Research has illustrated the utility of fecal microbiota transplantation in animal models, expanding the evidence base for a potential causal role of disorder-specific gut microbiota compositions in symptom set expression. Moreover, an exciting study by Constante and colleagues in this issue highlights the possibility of counteracting this microbiota-associated aberrant behavioral phenotype with a probiotic yeast, Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Such data highlights the potential for therapeutic targeting of the gut microbiota as a valuable strategy for the management of comorbid psychiatric symptoms in IBS.




Abstract:
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent stress-related mental disorders worldwide. Several biological mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of MDD have been proposed, including endocrine disturbances, neurotransmitter deficits, impaired neuronal plasticity, and more recently, mitochondrial dysfunctions. In this review, we provide an overview of relevant molecular correlates of mitochondrial dysfunction in MDD, based on findings from clinical studies and stress-induced rodent models. We also compare differences and similarities between the phenotypes of MDD patients and animal models. Our analysis of the literature reveals that both MDD and stress are associated, in humans and animals, with changes in mitochondrial biogenesis, redox imbalance, increased oxidative damages of cellular macromolecules, and apoptosis. Yet, a considerable amount of conflicting data exist and therefore, the translation of findings from clinical and preclinical research to novel therapies for MDD remains complex. Further studies are needed to advance our understanding of the molecular networks and biological mechanisms involving mitochondria in the pathophysiology of MDD.